Security still lacking one year after Mumbai attacks?

Mumbai remains a target one year on from a deadly militant attack, experts say, calling for more to be done to improve security in the city and elsewhere in India to prevent another strike.

"Can 26/11 happen again? Yes, any time," warned retired Major General V.K. Datta, India's most decorated army officer, referring to the November 26 attacks that killed 166 people and injured more than 300 last year.

The acting head of Maharashtra state police, A.N. Roy, said greater vigilance and better counter-terrorism measures were vital because Mumbai, the state capital, played a key role in India's economy.

His counterpart at Mumbai police, D. Sivanandan, said improvements have been made since the force was found lacking training, equipment and manpower against the 10 heavily armed Islamist gunmen who stormed the city 12 months ago.

More police in Mumbai and other Indian cities would provide a more effective first response to any future attack, analysts said, also calling for greater use of technology and better coordination between central and state agencies.

"We have not improved our preventive capability," Datta told India Today magazine earlier this month.

Home Minister P. Chidambaram, praised for pushing security up the agenda since his appointment late last year, also warned that India is just as vulnerable as before, calling the response to the Mumbai attacks "mixed."

In Mumbai itself there have been noticeable changes.

Luxury hotels such as the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower, which was targeted by gunmen, has introduced tougher baggage screening and searches, while sandbagged machinegun positions appeared at key locations.

A new base for 250 elite National Security Guard commandos -- one of four around the country -- opened in Mumbai after criticism that they only arrived from their north India headquarters 10 hours after the first shots were fired.

Both the Maharashtra and Mumbai police have also set up their own rapid reaction forces as part of a 1.3-billion-rupee (28-million-dollar) state government investment in training and equipment.

The Mumbai police central control room is being modernised and security cameras installed around the city, Sivanandan told business leaders earlier this month.

"As far as the police is concerned, whatever is possible is being done. We have got a long way to go. Give me another 100 crores (one billion rupees) and I will do a lot better than this," he said.

Some experts say that after a spate of bombings across India in 2008, the fact there has been no attack in the country in the last 12 months is proof the measures have been effective.

But some plans, including a promised improved coastal security system -- seen as vital because the gunmen arrived undetected by sea -- are yet to materialise.

Others believe Pakistan's intelligence agency and army, which New Delhi blames for supporting the attacks, are focused on gathering unrest at home rather than sponsoring assaults on their neighbour.

Ajai Sahni, executive director of the Institute of Conflict Management and editor of the South Asia Intelligence Review, called the changes in homeland security "nothing more than symbolic."

"In terms of actual capacity, response or overall security, there's been no significant change," he told AFP, blaming a lack of political will to tackle the problem effectively.

Maharashtra state police's Roy, though, said more had been done than after previous attacks on the city.

But he added: "Whereas the terrorists have access to the latest technology, communications and resources, we still are many, many, many steps behind. We are at a very nascent stage."

Sahni said boosting police capacity was vital as forces across India are severely understaffed, particularly of experienced senior officers.

Currently, enforcement of security measures is difficult because Mumbai has only 48,000 officers for an official population of about 14 million, he added.

The central government has said it will recruit 150,000 low-ranking police officers across the country by next March, though some experts say quality police using modern technology should be the biggest priority.

Roy told a security conference this month: "Today, we feel much more confident than we were one year ago -- but there is still a long way to go."


http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i4eo2nX0_KwX7N0qaXl9f2MZpZow

What do u think about security concerns in india?






Answer :
Whereas the terrorists have access to the latest technology, communications and resources, we still are many, many, many steps behind. India are at a very nascent stag






Answer :
Very poor.

They should not hold the Asian Games or the OLYMPICS


Cheers from DOWNUNDER